Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. These neurons might be involved in something other than simple pure-tone coding, such as processing of complex sound features You should create the sense that the visual and the word representations of data are working together.
What type of local connectivity might give rise to these results? Are your results presented in sufficient detail? These findings are consistent with the random connectivity model provided that there is at least one component of the overall connectivity that is strong, sparse and decreases fast with distance.
Typically, a detailed analysis of findings is provided in the conclusion section, including the reasons for not achieving the predicted outcome if the results did not meet writing a science report discussion groups expectations. Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc.
Often you can present the hypothesis and the supporting reasoning in one paragraph. Using direct quotations is appropriate to English papers, but not to lab reports. Use this brainstorming as a way of helping you to find details that make your Conclusion more convincing.
How similar or variable are the response properties of neighboring neurons in A1? Give evidence for each conclusion. Also, avoid using quotations. The report should link back to the existing hypothesis as documented in the literature review section of the report.
Such a statement is typically a sentence or two. For this discussion we focused on issues of disability, health care and the terminally ill.
Although our data seems to best fit the overlapping subnetworks model, it is only one interpretation of our results. As to choice of words, science writing uses words that its audience other scientists in the field will readily understand. The table below offers some questions effective discussion sections in scientific reports address.
Each description should include a sentence or so summarizing the visual and then any details from the visual pertinent to the data from that visual.
Typically, a detailed analysis of findings is provided in the conclusion section, including the reasons for not achieving the predicted outcome if the results did not meet the expectations. If you had trouble getting the first sentence started, here are some possibilities: If you need to have the right answer, then you should revisit your lab notebook to search out errors in recording data and transcribing data to spreadsheet and in any calculations you have done.
Avoid speculation that cannot be tested in the foreseeable future. This summary will act as the opening sentence for the Results. First, are you making a reasonable judgment about whether or not the hypothesis is supported by the findings?
Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations Because Ji Eun and I are both from Korea, I was able to paraphrase her comments when I realized that the Americans didn't understand her.
Improving your Results opens with effective statement of overall findings Results sections typically begin with a brief overview of the findings.
The discussion should cover all of the objectives specified in the report in depth. In addition, check your designation of the purpose of the lab in the Introduction. Different experimental procedures, including direct mappings of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits, would be required to reveal the underlying organizational principles of the auditory cortex.
Writing a Conclusion Section A conclusion section provides a synopsis of work in which the results findings are mapped to the objectives. Vary your sentence length.
If you did an engineering or programming project, did you state whether you met your design criteria? There are, generally speaking, three possible conclusions you could draw: Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology In all these cases, it is imperative that a lab report be factual and provide adequate summarization of findings, backed by concrete evidence.Group Project Survival Skills Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: San Francisco Edit, ; The Lab Report.
University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A. et al. "The Anatomy of an Article: The Discussion Section: "How Does the Article I. Except for writing the abstract, preparing your science fair project final report will just entail pulling together the information you have already collected into one large document.
Your final report. In a short report, your discussion section will also include your conclusion(s) and Pay careful attention to the following points when writing your discussion: the sample size was small (n= for each group) and was heterogeneous with respect to age, weight, starting cholesterol concentration and other lifestyle factors.
Improving Your Lab Report. The Discussion should start with a sentence or two in which you make a judgment as to whether your original hypothesis (from the Introduction) was supported, supported with qualifications, or not supported by the findings. As to choice of words, science writing uses words that its audience (other scientists in.
Writing a Discussion Section A key objective of the discussion section is to synthesize the results by providing a logical explanation. In most of the cases, the discussion section revolves around existing theories and hypotheses referenced in the literature review section of the lab report.
Writing the Discussion The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's.Download